In academic circles there is the kind of letting-off steam essay that some write, or think about writing, that is framed as a letter to a semi-hypothetical student, but which affords the writer a place to get something off of his or her chest. Said semi-hypothetical student is anonymous and in truth, is a concatenation of all of the other students who have struck the very same nerve in the writer.
Sometimes the tone of the letter is one long fling of anger about something--late papers, cell phones in class for example; other times the tone can be sarcastic or instructive (especially when the writer chooses to explain why the dear student's act was wrong on so many levels). Occasionally, these letters can take on the tone of the lofty, condescending professor of old, talking down to a population that may or may not be paying attention anyhow.
Actually, the real audience of these letters, all of them, doesn't seem to be written to the "dear student," but to the dear colleagues, who can respond with pity, sympathy or disagreement. When the writer moves to get away from the sarcasm and into an explanation of why an individual behavior or institutional practice is unproductive, counterproductive just plain wrong, then there's room for this reader to sit down and chew on the topic. Otherwise, I click away from the article and read something else.
The above is the long way into talking about the "Dear Plagiarist" article that ran a few days ago in the IHE. When I saw the title, "Dear Plagiarist," my first reaction was that the reader was going to be in for one of those bile-soaked outbursts in which not much is accomplished except the venting of an understandably frustrated college professor. Yes, the title caught my attention, but until Nels tweeted that the essay was worth reading, I was put off enough by the "j'acuse" title to skip it altogether. The very title suggests that the student has transgressed beyond redemption, though oddly, to put that label on the student also suggests that both student and act have considerable power, which several commentors show can be the case.
Couser's "dear student" is someone who seemed to avoid reading the assignment instructions or paying attention in class, and who flunked the paper by using Spark Notes to think for her--though she did paraphrase the work. Based on his refutations, it doesn't sound like he had simply given a terse assignment and expected the students to forage for themselves in the great forest of the humanities. Instead, it sounds like he gave assignments and readings that would have lead anyone paying attention to be able to at least try writing a response.
The truth is, we don't know what lead to the student's behavior, and the overall tone seems to be one of exasperation with her. I've been there, and I'll bet you have, too. And I'm sure I'm not the only professor to have been impressed with the energy, intelligence and creativity some students put into pleading their cases, from our offices all the up the chain. But the questions remain--why didn't the student just write the paper? And why was it easier not to? And are we surprised that TurnitIn didn't catch it? And why did the student bother to paraphrase? And what goes on institutionally that allows students to cheat on papers and get by with it because their untenured or parttime instructors rightfully fear that the poor grade will make said instructors look bad?
Raising these questions, listening to the conversations that bring in answers from all kinds of perspectives and readings (like Pluralizing Plagiarism,for example)seem to be the most useful response we can enact when reading any essay/letter of this genre, which seems,on the surface to be an individual cry for help, but which carries undercurrents of an ongoing professional need to critique a situation that occurs time and again.
I wouldn't really say it's worth reading. It just didn't seem like a big deal to me, but I've probably been reading too many posts from Rate Your Students where faculty talk about wishing their students would get raped so that something like this seems ordinary and banal in its complaining.
Posted by: Nels P. Highberg | July 07, 2009 at 10:01 AM
Thanks for the clarification--RYS sounds pretty ghastly.
Posted by: joanna | July 09, 2009 at 10:21 AM
There's a lot of rape and death wish material at Rate Your Students. I think they published one article where a professor dreamed of smashing a student's head with a hammer. It's really frightening.
Posted by: William Harper | December 29, 2009 at 06:04 PM
oh interesting! that's quite an information there and i think it IS a site that is to be reckoned with if you own a small business and you need to be on top of what people are saying about you now
Posted by: cna certification test | July 16, 2010 at 08:28 AM
~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~oh interesting! that's quite an information there and i think it IS a site that is to be reckoned with if you own a small business and you need to be on top of what people are saying about you now
Posted by: red cross cna classes | July 17, 2010 at 02:34 AM
"Dear Plagiarist" is indeed an eye-catching title. Anybody would like to read on this topic as this is one the hottest topic nowadays.
Posted by: How to become a CNA | September 16, 2010 at 11:08 AM
Rhetorical word "Dear Students" are just rhetoric. Before this point, there are many scales for grading and assessing writing. These are the first step instructors took towards a holistic grading form. However, these scales are still dominated by administrative characteristics, not student improvement.
Posted by: Pet Food | October 05, 2010 at 03:29 PM
I hope this allowed, I have never used this website before so I wasn't really sure what this was going to do. So this is just a test post. I really like this forum, it has some excellent discussions that take place.
Posted by: Coach Outlet Store Online | July 05, 2011 at 10:00 PM
I am sorry but I did not understand your post. What issues and what are we to expect in the form of these issues.Kindly be a little more specific
Posted by: Coach Outlet | July 15, 2011 at 02:26 AM
That was my thought,too.
Posted by: supra skytop uk | October 10, 2011 at 03:10 AM
Good post. And thank you for your share. I learn many thing in this post. I will tell others your idea.
Posted by: Coach Outlet Store Online | October 25, 2011 at 11:50 PM
I like your content.
Posted by: cane | November 17, 2011 at 03:36 AM
I have to say. I rarely met a blog, which are both instructive and entertaining, let me tell you, this is a kind of mixed together, but I need some advice from the establishment of blog.
Posted by: Coach Outlet | November 17, 2011 at 09:37 PM
I am totally agree with your oppinion.this blog post is very encouraging to people who want to know these topics.
Posted by: moncler mens vests | November 18, 2011 at 12:32 AM
If you want to understand more about this whole good words would you please come to my blog. He is the Expert at Google in charge for optimizing search results. He also has a blog with some insider information. Surely an interesting read.
Posted by: Coach Outlet | November 20, 2011 at 10:22 PM
Really impressed! Everything is very, very clear, open is a description of the problem. It contains the information.
Posted by: Ugg UK Sale | December 06, 2011 at 04:07 AM
This is an article I've seen one of the most exciting , its content is very rich , rich in a lot of philosophy of life , giving the knowledge about the many interesting and helpful information . Thank you for sharing . Look forward to your updates.
Posted by: Coach Factory Oultet | January 10, 2012 at 02:13 AM
Now, if you haven't got windows or are stuck in the gloom of monsoon season, artificial lighting will work.
Posted by: phoenix painting | December 12, 2012 at 09:23 AM